Innate Immortality -- A Christian Doctrine?

Steven M. Jones

Immortality! It has been "brought to light" by Jesus Christ and his gospel (2 Tim 1 10). Eternal life-an immortal existence--is offered freely to the lowest of sinners who reach out and take hold of the Savior by faith. Christ himself said, "And this is the will of him that sent me, that every one which seeth the Son and believeth on him may have everlasting life, and, will raise him up, at the last day" (John 6:40). This must be underscored in the Church today; it is a point at which multitudes stumble. The eternal life given by our Lord Is fused inseparably to the resurrection at the end of the age. It has nothing to do with some ethereal, phantom-like threshold crossed at death. The Blessed Hope of the Christian (Titus 2:13) will always be the Second Advent-the time when mortality is swallowed up by immortality, corruption puts on incorruption, and death loses its terrible efficacy (1 Cor 15:52-54).

This is a truth in constant need of emphasis. It has been supplanted over the centuries by a concept utterly foreign to the Scripture; the innate immortality of man. All human beings, we are told, possess a "soul" (the real self), which dwells for a time in the body. Death is the liberator for the believing soul, which wings its way to the "hereafter" to be with Jesus- That "last enemy"(1 Cor 15:26) is neither an enemy, nor is it even a true death-it is only a change from one life to another₉ an evacuation of the body.

Immortality of the Soul?

The Bible offers no sanction of such notions. Here we discover that God atone possesses innate immortality (1 Tim 6:16). Man

forfeited any claim to it in Eden (Gen 2:17). Indeed, not only did God impose the sentence of death upon Adam and Eve, but also repelled them from that Tree of Life which was the source of human immortality (Gen 3:22-24). Would any contend that our first parents, who returned to dust in fulfillment of the divine curse (Gen 3; 19), were, nevertheless, immortal beings? if so, then we must ascribe integrity to the serpent's lie, "Ye shall not surely die" (Gen 3:4).

Scripture paints death in a much different hue. When a man draws his last breath, he perishes-in totality. That is why David dreaded the grave. He knew that to die was to lose one's self, to cease consciousness. Listen to his testimonies:

For in death there is no remembrance of thee: in the grave who shall give thee thanks? (Psalm 6:5)

"The dead praise not the Lord, neither any that go down into silence" (Psalm 115:17).

Godly Hezekiah also shrank from the shadow of death, recognizing its true character:

"For the grave cannot praise thee, death cannot celebrate thee: they that go down into the pit cannot hope for thy truth. The living, the living, be shall praise thee" (Isa 38:18,19).

The inspired Preacher of Ecclesiates sums up the entire matter of death in the plainest possible language:

"The living know that they shall die: but the dead know not any thing, neither have they any more reward; for the memory of them is forgotten. Also their love, and their hatred, and their envy, is now perished..." (EccI 9:5,6).

New Testament theology presents death in the same manner. Paul wrote of the recovery of Epaphroditus, who was sick unto death. The apostle's commentary on this event was that "God had mercy on him" (Phil 2:27). Mercy? Is being deprived of heaven a mercy? And the raising of Lazarus, or Dorcas, or the widow's son. Would it have been a mercy to snatch these saints out of celestial bliss to suffer pain and temptation again on this wicked earth? No, the restoration of life is always portrayed as a good and gracious act. Length of days on the earth is a blessing from God (Eph 6:3), not a postponement of glory. The elders are to anoint the sick, that they may be healed (James 5:14,15). Why? Because death is death and not life. The open grave is a curse, an enemy to be overcome.

Resurrection Hope at Christ's Coming

When the Thessalonians were sorrowing over deceased loved ones, Paul took up his pen to offer encouragement Did he tell them that the righteous dead are "with the Lord" as bodiless souls? Did he assure the church that the grave is really a doorway to eternal joy? He did no such thing. The apostle wrote of the return of Christ, when the dead shall rise (1 Thes 4:13-18). Those departed brethren are not singing, or rejoicing, or "looking down on us"--they are asleep in their graves, awaiting the resurrection(1 Thes4:14; 1 Cor 15:51. See also Job 14:12; 2 Kings 20:21; Acts 7:60; 2 Pet 3:4). Such is the Pauline view of death.

The tragic consequence of this widespread belief in inherent immortality is the devaluing of Christ's Second Coming. If the dead saints are really alive with the Lord, what great need is there for a resurrection? Since it is constantly asserted that the "soul" is the all-important component of man-his "true self"-

the raising up of the body should be a comparatively trivial matter. Even Christ's own resurrection sounds a hollow ring when we maintain that 411 men since Adam survive death as immortal souls.

The authors of Scripture, however, are adamant about this: the Second Advent is our only hope for life after death. If Jesus does not come again, we will all perish in the dust of the earth, forever. A simple reading of the following passages should make the answer to each subsequent question abundantly clear:

· Man 13:41-43: When will the righteous shine in the Father's kingdom?

· Matt 16:27: When will everyone be rewarded according to his works?

· 1 Cor 13:10-13: When will we see Jesus face-to-face?

· 2 Tim 4:8: When will we receive the Crown of Righteousness?

· Rev 20:12: When is the Judgment?

· 1 John 3:2: When will we see Christ and be like him?

The same answer virtually leaps from the pages of Scripture: The Second Advent. Death receives no accolades as a bees tower of blessing, or as a "passing through the Jordan" into Christ's presence. It is a thing to be abolished and cast into the Lake of Fire at the last day (Rev 20:14).

The immortality of the soul makes a mockery of all this. Resurrection becomes superfluous, since we can relate to Christ"out of body." And because the saints have already spent long ages with Christ, the Porous becomes some-thing less than the great "revelation" portrayed by Scripture. Finally, the Judgment is transformed into a farce. after spending thousands of Years. in heaven, will Abel have to pass before the bar of divine justice to determine whether or not his name is written in the Book of Life? Conversely, will Judas be sumrnmoned from a bell he has occupied for two millennia to discover if he is really among the damned? Any doctrine which allows for such scenarios ought to be suspect from the very outset.

The Mortality of the Soul

The Word of God admits of no "undying essence" within the human makeup. "The soul that sinneth, it shall die" (Ezek 18:20). This prophetic utterance should, by itself, put the whole argument of immortal souls out of court, forever. Man is mortal. In this, he has "no advantage over the beasts" (Eccl 3:19). Resurrection is his only hope. Without Christ he will "not see life" (John 3:36).

The standard objection to such teaching is the dogmatic assertion of a "life of the body / life of the soul" dualism. It is only the body-the empty shell once housing the soul-that has perished. The real person is either in paradise or in torment , a condition in which he will abide forever and ever.

The Scriptural testimony however, is entirely against this view. The real person is always laid in the tomb. "Abraham buried Sarah, his wife in the cave of the field of Machpelah" (Gen 23:19). Nowhere is it hinted that the patriarch merely buried a fleshly receptacle recently vacated by an immortal woman. There is no record of Abraham praising God for admitting his beloved spouse to the "streets of gold." Modern funeral Ianguage is hopelessly out of step with the Bible. Death is always met with grief and mourning (even by Christ-John 11:35,36), because the true person is now lifeless-no longer a functioning soul.

We read of the entombment of Jacob (Gen 50:~) and of Stephen (Acts 8:2). In each case, the corpse is the person. Devout men wept over Stephen not over a thing in which the martyr once lived. David, we are told by Peter, is in the sepulcre, "both dead and buried" (Acts 2:29) As if to refute any future notions of innate immortality, he assures us in the same

breath that "David is not ascended into the heavens" (Acts 2:34).

Evangelicals Rethink "Soul" Concept

There is a growing recognition among evangelicals that the old, main-line position on body/soul dualism is untenable. George Eldon Ladd comments on the Pauline perspective:

Dutch theologian, Herman Ridderbos echoes these convictions:

Such men as Ladd and Ridderbos are recognized by evangelicals as conservative, responsible theologians. They can hardly be written off as "cultists," neither can they be justly accused of harboring a bias toward such an interpretation. On the contrary, both acknowledge a conscious survival of the man after death. Their impeccably honest scholarship, however, shines through as they exegete psyche and nephesh--even when such exegesis is inconsistent with their own views on life after death.

Conclusion

The average Christian has been instructed to regard the concept of total mortality as "cult doctrine." For this reason, it is difficult for

many of God's people to approach the subject with an open mind. This is understandable; no genuine follower of Jesus desires to be caught up in bizzare, cultish dogmas. On the other hand, we must be quick to realize that guilt-by. association is not a fair method by which to test she truth or falsity of any tenet of faith. If it were, we might discountenance the immortality of the soul on the basis of its acceptance by Spiritists, Mormons, Christian Scientists and New Age advocates Obviously, a rejection of either position on the basis of ad hominem arguments is a practice unworthy of a careful Bible student.

The total mortality of man is a doctrine of great antiquity in the Church. Its exponents can be found in nearly every age of church history. Whether or not it has always been a majority opinion is irrelevant. Was not Luther expressing a very obscure, minority opinion when he posted the theses? And the Anabaptist martyrs-were they not regarded as wild-eyed fanatics for opposing the unquestioned union of Church and State? Yet these men believed they possessed truth, and were willing to stand up for it in the face of overwhelming majority opposition.

Their courage of conviction ought to be emulated in the Church today. It is time to examine this issue in the light of sola scriptura, rather than simply parroting the opinions of the masses. With an open Bible and a Berean spirit (Acts 17:11), let us seek Out the things which God has freely revealed to us in his Word. As we penetrate the recesses of divine truth, may we then share our findings with the rest of God's people in the loving spirit of the one who is the Resurrection and the Life.